Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 65165 for or b.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 65165 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142619 - 2015-06-02
was prejudicial. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142619 - 2015-06-02
State v. Boyd W. Pigman
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MArshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MArshall B. Murray, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
Dunhill Temps of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Susan A. Covert
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Although Covert and Site refer this court to § 814.02, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11067 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Although Covert and Site refer this court to § 814.02, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11067 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Morris
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
” and that he requested permission to search O’Donnell’s vehicle “[b]ecause of the information I received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21
” and that he requested permission to search O’Donnell’s vehicle “[b]ecause of the information I received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
-respondent there was a brief filed by Catherine B. Scherer, assistant corporation counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801505 - 2024-05-14
-respondent there was a brief filed by Catherine B. Scherer, assistant corporation counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801505 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Portage County: THOMAS B. EAGON and NICHOLAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
. APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Portage County: THOMAS B. EAGON and NICHOLAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
809.23(1)(b)5. AN EXHIBIT HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO THIS OPINION. THE EXHIBIT CAN BE OBTAINED UNDER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14732 - 2005-12-13
809.23(1)(b)5. AN EXHIBIT HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO THIS OPINION. THE EXHIBIT CAN BE OBTAINED UNDER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14732 - 2005-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in this dispute. ¶9 Marina Bay argues that the City acted inconsistently with Wis. Stat. § 30.13(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2015-03-23
in this dispute. ¶9 Marina Bay argues that the City acted inconsistently with Wis. Stat. § 30.13(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2015-03-23