Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Phillip E. Holman
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. William M. Ginsberg
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
hearing. No. 96-1251 -2- court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10768 - 2017-09-20
hearing. No. 96-1251 -2- court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10768 - 2017-09-20
State v. Donshea L. Trotter
from the judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
from the judgment of conviction entered against him after a jury trial and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
Gary Sutrick v. Myles Wellnitz
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that § 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that § 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Williams
postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Williams received effective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Williams received effective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, repossession should have ceased pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 425.206(2)(a) and (3). ¶3 Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105182 - 2013-12-04
, repossession should have ceased pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 425.206(2)(a) and (3). ¶3 Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105182 - 2013-12-04
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
entered guilty pleas pursuant to this agreement in December 1990, the trial court withheld sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
entered guilty pleas pursuant to this agreement in December 1990, the trial court withheld sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
City of Menasha v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31