Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20431 - 20440 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
Search results 20431 - 20440 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
State v. Dirk E. Harris
in the prosecution's case-in-chief. We conclude that the circuit court committed error by not excluding physical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16857 - 2005-03-31
in the prosecution's case-in-chief. We conclude that the circuit court committed error by not excluding physical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
in this case meet the third test set out in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) that it must not be so
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
in this case meet the third test set out in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) that it must not be so
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
PER CURIAM. This case comes before us on remand from the supreme court. On October 21, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4233 - 2017-09-19
PER CURIAM. This case comes before us on remand from the supreme court. On October 21, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4233 - 2017-09-19
Rusk County Citizen Action Group, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95‑3125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9954 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95‑3125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
in this case meet the third test set out in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) that it must not be so
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
in this case meet the third test set out in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) that it must not be so
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sterling Rachwal
that this is not a case like State v. Walker, 117 Wis.2d 579, 345 N.W.2d 413 (1984), where the supreme court, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13794 - 2005-03-31
that this is not a case like State v. Walker, 117 Wis.2d 579, 345 N.W.2d 413 (1984), where the supreme court, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James O. Edwards
2002 WI App 66 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3684 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 66 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3684 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alan J. Ernst
. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1246 - 2017-09-19
. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1246 - 2017-09-19
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which Creaser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14125 - 2005-03-31
. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which Creaser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kimberly Sotelo
search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We therefore reverse the order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9223 - 2005-03-31
search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We therefore reverse the order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9223 - 2005-03-31