Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20431 - 20440 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] State v. Jonathon D. Bell
hearing on his postconviction claims seeking to withdraw his plea of no contest based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13998 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. He claimed he spent the day before the shooting with Taylor at their grandmother’s house until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352536 - 2021-04-01

[PDF] State v. Thomas E. Eckert
to suppress the evidence obtained subsequent to his arrest, claiming the police lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9330 - 2017-09-19

WI App 125 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2739 Complete Title o...
, Alyce Armstrong, appeals the order granting summary judgment to Allstate Indemnity Company on her claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127373 - 2015-02-12

Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
. We further hold that the Hoepkers' takings claim is not ripe for adjudication. We therefore affirm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
also claimed he did not receive notice of the dismissal. ¶9 The referee noted that when Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31

State v. Thomas E. Eckert
, claiming the police lacked probable cause to arrest him. The trial court denied the motion. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9330 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition motion. They were part of his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. The sections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228778 - 2018-12-04

[PDF] State v. Jonathon D. Bell
hearing on his postconviction claims seeking to withdraw his plea of no contest based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13996 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
that the Hoepkers' takings claim is not ripe for adjudication. We therefore affirm the decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21