Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20441 - 20450 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20441 - 20450 of 68502 for did.
County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
did not move to suppress the blood alcohol evidence, but raised the issue of the statutory presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
did not move to suppress the blood alcohol evidence, but raised the issue of the statutory presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
Equity Development,Inc. v. Kim Ayers
-39 (1963). Whether § 812.11, Stats., holds Bryco, as the garnishee, liable for sums of money that did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11474 - 2005-03-31
-39 (1963). Whether § 812.11, Stats., holds Bryco, as the garnishee, liable for sums of money that did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11474 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darren M. Mueller
chose not to ask for a lesser-included instruction on reckless injury. Counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7727 - 2005-03-31
chose not to ask for a lesser-included instruction on reckless injury. Counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7727 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W.C.
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15655 - 2005-03-31
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale W. Repinski
failure to request a recess or continuance; and (4) Repinski's counsel did discuss the consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10182 - 2005-03-31
failure to request a recess or continuance; and (4) Repinski's counsel did discuss the consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
income was $23,853.75. The parties did not own any real estate. The majority of marital assets were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154650 - 2017-09-21
income was $23,853.75. The parties did not own any real estate. The majority of marital assets were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154650 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98998 - 2013-07-09
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98998 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court did not allow the parties to make additional oral arguments. Instead, the court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
, the circuit court did not allow the parties to make additional oral arguments. Instead, the court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
detention, indicates “it was determined that a 72- hour hold would be appropriate.” However, Bartlein did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71380 - 2014-09-15
detention, indicates “it was determined that a 72- hour hold would be appropriate.” However, Bartlein did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71380 - 2014-09-15