Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20441 - 20450 of 50070 for our.
Search results 20441 - 20450 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an issue raised for the first time on appeal in the exercise of our discretion, depending upon the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84803 - 2014-09-15
an issue raised for the first time on appeal in the exercise of our discretion, depending upon the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As part of our analysis, we interpreted § 973.20(13)(c)2. as allowing restitution to be imposed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
. As part of our analysis, we interpreted § 973.20(13)(c)2. as allowing restitution to be imposed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the plea, he or she is entitled to withdrawal." Id. "Our case law establishes that not all defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21
the plea, he or she is entitled to withdrawal." Id. "Our case law establishes that not all defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” is not defined within the statute. ¶7 In Magnuson, our supreme court was asked to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248686 - 2019-10-16
” is not defined within the statute. ¶7 In Magnuson, our supreme court was asked to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248686 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The standard of review drives our decision. WISCONSIN STAT. § 180.1430(2)(c) provides that a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
The standard of review drives our decision. WISCONSIN STAT. § 180.1430(2)(c) provides that a circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
. We agree with the trial court that it is precluded. ¶8 In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
. We agree with the trial court that it is precluded. ¶8 In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.83(2). Nevertheless, we exercise our discretion to address the merits of Kroeger’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
. RULE 809.83(2). Nevertheless, we exercise our discretion to address the merits of Kroeger’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1990). Valerie’s argument is not consistent with our standard of review. When the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15
. 1990). Valerie’s argument is not consistent with our standard of review. When the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
as Kelly brought his vehicle to a stop himself. Our analysis of this issue requires us to look at what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
as Kelly brought his vehicle to a stop himself. Our analysis of this issue requires us to look at what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
credibility, and we respect that determination under our standard of review. ¶12 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
credibility, and we respect that determination under our standard of review. ¶12 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19