Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
to a request. In this case, the trial court determined that the department's delay in responding to Ledford's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
to a request. In this case, the trial court determined that the department's delay in responding to Ledford's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Circuit Court denying sentence credit. In this case, the circuit court imposed a sentence to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238212 - 2019-03-28
Circuit Court denying sentence credit. In this case, the circuit court imposed a sentence to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238212 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
May 15, 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141995 - 2017-09-21
May 15, 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assigned to E.F. in family court proceedings involving E.F.’s parents. In its rebuttal case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441626 - 2021-10-14
assigned to E.F. in family court proceedings involving E.F.’s parents. In its rebuttal case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441626 - 2021-10-14
[PDF]
Guadalupe Fernandez v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
intercept does not meet due process requirements under federal statues and federal case law.5 Fernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12948 - 2017-09-21
intercept does not meet due process requirements under federal statues and federal case law.5 Fernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the petition, and the case proceeded to a court trial on October 25, 2021. The following facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575010 - 2022-10-11
the petition, and the case proceeded to a court trial on October 25, 2021. The following facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575010 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
March 25, 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138478 - 2017-09-21
March 25, 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for relief in cases from 1991, 2007, and 2008. The circuit court explained that, with respect to the 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
for relief in cases from 1991, 2007, and 2008. The circuit court explained that, with respect to the 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the decision in this case. Therefore, Boe’s first argument is that the previous court of appeals decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106668 - 2017-09-21
the decision in this case. Therefore, Boe’s first argument is that the previous court of appeals decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court adjourned the case for an oral ruling on January 6, 2020. ¶8 At the hearing on January 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760139 - 2024-02-06
, the court adjourned the case for an oral ruling on January 6, 2020. ¶8 At the hearing on January 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760139 - 2024-02-06