Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 34014 for dismissal.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 34014 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the longstanding rule in this state that a sentencing court may consider dismissed charges, including “facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107618 - 2017-09-21
to the longstanding rule in this state that a sentencing court may consider dismissed charges, including “facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tracy O.
must be dismissed, thereby leaving the TPR order unabated. If this court rejects the holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11387 - 2017-09-19
must be dismissed, thereby leaving the TPR order unabated. If this court rejects the holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11387 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, then the circuit court would have reversed the conviction and dismissed the case with prejudice, even though
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103700 - 2017-09-21
, then the circuit court would have reversed the conviction and dismissed the case with prejudice, even though
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103700 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
earlier bail. In exchange for dismissal of the two bail jumping charges and one battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12001 - 2017-09-21
earlier bail. In exchange for dismissal of the two bail jumping charges and one battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
to terminate the stay. ¶10 On appeal, Pluemer argues the court should have dismissed the motion because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
to terminate the stay. ¶10 On appeal, Pluemer argues the court should have dismissed the motion because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissed Shimmin’s appeal on October 11, 2019, based upon Shimmin’s failure to pay the filing fee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640713 - 2023-04-04
dismissed Shimmin’s appeal on October 11, 2019, based upon Shimmin’s failure to pay the filing fee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640713 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreed to recommend that the court dismiss and read in the remaining counts. The parties remained free
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
agreed to recommend that the court dismiss and read in the remaining counts. The parties remained free
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
CA Blank Order
other drug charges were dismissed as read ins. At sentencing, the prosecutor made the recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135071 - 2015-02-17
other drug charges were dismissed as read ins. At sentencing, the prosecutor made the recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135071 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in which charges in three other felony matters were dismissed and read in, and a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
in which charges in three other felony matters were dismissed and read in, and a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the age of sixteen. The remaining counts were dismissed and read-in for purposes of sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263732 - 2020-06-09
the age of sixteen. The remaining counts were dismissed and read-in for purposes of sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263732 - 2020-06-09