Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 55167 for n c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence and placed Overton on four years’ probation. Overton appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶10 “[A]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219535 - 2018-09-25

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Moeck
. 2d 122, 133 n.8, 291 N.W.2d 487 (1980) (“The defendant should be given the ultimate decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.” Subsec. 809.25(3)(c). We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180527 - 2017-09-21

WI App 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1944 Complete Title ...
review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute in making its assessment.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119650 - 2014-09-23

State v. Daryl M. Knighten
general, and William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott A. Rudoll
In March 2002, the State charged Rudoll with three counts of second-degree sexual assault, a class C felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Todd M. McKenzie (L. C. No. 2013CF53) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188796 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bobby R. Dabney
conclusion is supported by the legislature’s recent enactment of Wis. Stat. § 939.74(2d)(b). C. Due Process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5656 - 2005-03-31

WI App 160 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3159 Complete Title...
). Id., ¶26 n.13. The Masseys interpret this footnote as holding that appellate courts must address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73604 - 2011-12-13