Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Gary Sutrick v. Myles Wellnitz
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that ยง 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that ยง 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13369 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sauk County Department of Human Services v. James Carney
recovery for the 1989 No. 97-0115 2 services and that the trial court erred by excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11952 - 2017-09-21
recovery for the 1989 No. 97-0115 2 services and that the trial court erred by excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11952 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13370 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him after a jury trial of one count of first- degree sexual assault of a child (sexual contact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570243 - 2022-09-27
him after a jury trial of one count of first- degree sexual assault of a child (sexual contact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570243 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
Robert Stanek v. John C. Mickelson
the sufficiency of the evidence and trial court procedure that cannot be reviewed without a trial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8794 - 2017-09-19
the sufficiency of the evidence and trial court procedure that cannot be reviewed without a trial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8794 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
State v. Phillip E. Holman
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31