Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Practices Act (DTPA) pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 100.18 (2021-22).1 Following a jury trial, the Sheas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896053 - 2025-01-02
Practices Act (DTPA) pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 100.18 (2021-22).1 Following a jury trial, the Sheas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896053 - 2025-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Sherrie S. Tucker
the disclosure of juror information in a criminal trial, and, if juror information is restricted, what
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21
the disclosure of juror information in a criminal trial, and, if juror information is restricted, what
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
(Thompson) a new trial after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
(Thompson) a new trial after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
seeking reconsideration of the trial court’s decision. Donohoo contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29182 - 2014-09-15
seeking reconsideration of the trial court’s decision. Donohoo contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29182 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s decision. Donohoo contends the trial court erred in holding that the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29182 - 2007-06-26
of the trial court’s decision. Donohoo contends the trial court erred in holding that the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29182 - 2007-06-26
Robert W. Ganley v. Department of Corrections
a petition for review by certiorari and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Ganley appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12440 - 2005-03-31
a petition for review by certiorari and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Ganley appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 52
denying his motion for a new trial based on Eison’s claim that “other acts” evidence was erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60548 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for a new trial based on Eison’s claim that “other acts” evidence was erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60548 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. He also contends the court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99863 - 2017-09-21
was not entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. He also contends the court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99863 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 37
order denying his motion for a new trial under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] He contends the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31688 - 2008-03-18
order denying his motion for a new trial under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] He contends the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31688 - 2008-03-18
State v. Robert W. Ganley
a petition for review by certiorari and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Ganley appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12438 - 2005-03-31
a petition for review by certiorari and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Ganley appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12438 - 2005-03-31