Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 46
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690818 - 2023-10-11
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690818 - 2023-10-11
State v. David S. Frederick
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6796 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6796 - 2005-03-31
Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19336 - 2005-08-17
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19336 - 2005-08-17
State v. Richard E. Davis
the open records law—was de minimis, and also non-prejudicial. Apparently, Davis’s jail misbehavior did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
the open records law—was de minimis, and also non-prejudicial. Apparently, Davis’s jail misbehavior did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Maryland Casualty Company v. Evan Ben-Hur
of the trial court's ruling is de novo. Bay View Packing Co. v. Taff, 198 Wis.2d 654, 673, 543 N.W.2d 522
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8272 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court's ruling is de novo. Bay View Packing Co. v. Taff, 198 Wis.2d 654, 673, 543 N.W.2d 522
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8272 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Parker
and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11493 - 2017-09-19
and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11493 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s decision de novo.”4 State ex rel. Gehl v. Connors, 2007 WI App 238, ¶16, 306 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
the circuit court’s decision de novo.”4 State ex rel. Gehl v. Connors, 2007 WI App 238, ¶16, 306 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2); Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2); Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Emjay Inv. Co. v. Village of Germantown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88802 - 2014-09-15
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Emjay Inv. Co. v. Village of Germantown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88802 - 2014-09-15