Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525963 - 2022-05-25
they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525963 - 2022-05-25
[PDF]
WI APP 73
(6) to the undisputed facts in this case, our standard of review is de novo. See Hempel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21
(6) to the undisputed facts in this case, our standard of review is de novo. See Hempel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 114
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26708 - 2014-09-15
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10001 - 2017-09-19
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10001 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo, see State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶18 Borowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106060 - 2013-12-26
is de novo, see State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶18 Borowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106060 - 2013-12-26
De Ann Nichols v. Monte Nichols
In re the Marriage of: De Ann Nichols, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7407 - 2005-03-31
In re the Marriage of: De Ann Nichols, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7407 - 2005-03-31
Ira Lee Anderson-El v. Marianne Cooke
). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13736 - 2005-03-31
). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13736 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 10
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
[PDF]
Riverwood Park, Inc. v. Central Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc.
and 104 lots in Riverwood Park.” Riverwood Park appeals. We review decisions on summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8097 - 2017-09-19
and 104 lots in Riverwood Park.” Riverwood Park appeals. We review decisions on summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8097 - 2017-09-19
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13
interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13