Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 68276 for did.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 68276 for did.
CA Blank Order
form did not indicate whether the State’s recommendation would be concurrent or consecutive. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101898 - 2013-09-16
form did not indicate whether the State’s recommendation would be concurrent or consecutive. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101898 - 2013-09-16
Hershel E. Hooven v. Truck Country of Wisconsin
), Stats. Truck Country did not “grant” Hooven credit; it expected Hooven’s payment in full when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12822 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. Truck Country did not “grant” Hooven credit; it expected Hooven’s payment in full when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12822 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
was not required to “divest and transfer the title” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
was not required to “divest and transfer the title” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
State v. James McCready
McCready comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15746 - 2017-09-21
McCready comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David W.C.
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15655 - 2017-09-21
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15655 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
emphasized Cochran did not feel the victim deserved restitution and became upset whenever Martin explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
emphasized Cochran did not feel the victim deserved restitution and became upset whenever Martin explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
State v. Allan N.
in his trial testimony, including: that he did not learn of Kimeo's birth until Kimeo was almost three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
in his trial testimony, including: that he did not learn of Kimeo's birth until Kimeo was almost three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for fighting with another student. Phillips testified she did not believe juvenile services would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28032 - 2014-09-15
for fighting with another student. Phillips testified she did not believe juvenile services would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28032 - 2014-09-15