Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 68502 for did.
State v. Da Vang
relief. Vang argues he did not validly waive his right to appellate counsel on direct appeal. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7530 - 2005-03-31
relief. Vang argues he did not validly waive his right to appellate counsel on direct appeal. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7530 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because the committee “did not explain in its decision how the length of Richards’ deferment affected his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110580 - 2014-04-23
because the committee “did not explain in its decision how the length of Richards’ deferment affected his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110580 - 2014-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Arden Krueger
to object when the trial court provided the jury with an instruction that did not contain an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2542 - 2017-09-19
to object when the trial court provided the jury with an instruction that did not contain an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2542 - 2017-09-19
County of Marinette v. Robert A. Greene
had probable cause to administer the PBT and that the result did not compel that Sievert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14426 - 2005-03-31
had probable cause to administer the PBT and that the result did not compel that Sievert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14426 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. April O.
that the trial court did lose competency to proceed and therefore reverse the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3420 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did lose competency to proceed and therefore reverse the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3420 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
telephonic appearance at the plea hearing did not deny Van Patten his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
telephonic appearance at the plea hearing did not deny Van Patten his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2 M.G. did not appear in the courtroom at disposition. Her attorney indicated that she was upset
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180518 - 2017-09-21
, 2 M.G. did not appear in the courtroom at disposition. Her attorney indicated that she was upset
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
because the deed by which he obtained title to the land did not convey land within the 66-foot right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34253 - 2014-09-15
because the deed by which he obtained title to the land did not convey land within the 66-foot right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34253 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2009AP1548-CR 4 Cochran did not feel the victim deserved restitution and became upset whenever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48823 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP1548-CR 4 Cochran did not feel the victim deserved restitution and became upset whenever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
report. See Tillman, 281 Wis. 2d 157, ¶19. ¶9 In his appellate briefs, Satcher asserts that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15
report. See Tillman, 281 Wis. 2d 157, ¶19. ¶9 In his appellate briefs, Satcher asserts that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15