Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 49816 for our.

CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135021 - 2015-02-17

State v. Floyd Hopkins
a wholly law-abiding member of our community. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24

County of Jefferson v. James I. Krause
is a possibility sufficient to undermine our confidence in the conviction.’” State v. Moore, 2002 WI App 245, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael G.
is without merit. Our supreme court has already held that § 48.315 cannot be used to expand the duration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bryan Gary
was sentenced to less than the maximum. It relies on the following paragraph from another of our decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we Nos. 2020AP868-CR 2020AP869-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that it did not do so is not dispositive to our analysis. Likewise, the fact that LMJ Imaging defaulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91764 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to 3 Despite our explanation in State v. Gautschi, 2000 WI App 274, ¶8, 240 Wis. 2d 83, 622 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appointments, we would not be able to serve our customers wanting to come in for an eye exam thus ending up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15