Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20461 - 20470 of 64027 for records/1000.

[PDF] State v. Duran Thomas
it, but did agree to include the motion in the record. The court then proceeded to sentencing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
reputational evidence with specific instances of other bad acts. Because the record does not clearly reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3392 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18

CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92812 - 2013-02-10

[PDF] Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
numerous references to arguments the DOT made before the small claims court, but the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14708 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
. The record does not indicate a disposition for the “operating left of center” charge noted in the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19

Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
disposition, including expert testimony. See Wis. Stat. § 48.427(1). The record, however, relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter Smith
witness had criminal records—so did Smith and Jackson. Smith wished to impeach the State's witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8406 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Micro Colorgraphics, Inc. v. Robert and Nancy Unger
. 5 Our review of the record indicates that Northwoods also sought punitive damages when it added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8313 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the reconsideration.” Considering everything, the court noted that “the record does not support [Schmitz’s] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554060 - 2022-08-10