Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20471 - 20480 of 68276 for did.
Search results 20471 - 20480 of 68276 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
and extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit report, to which Claudio did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34384 - 2008-10-27
and extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit report, to which Claudio did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34384 - 2008-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the cost to respond to this appeal “was an excessive and risky use of [T]rust funds” and that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
that the cost to respond to this appeal “was an excessive and risky use of [T]rust funds” and that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
conducted a hearing on the motion on January 6, 2005. Gerard did not appear for the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
conducted a hearing on the motion on January 6, 2005. Gerard did not appear for the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
State v. James McCready
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15745 - 2005-03-31
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15745 - 2005-03-31
State v. James McCready
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15746 - 2005-03-31
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15746 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did not highlight that the charge related to oral intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did not highlight that the charge related to oral intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” (citation omitted)). We do not agree. Although the Department did not use the word moot in its answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841714 - 2024-08-28
” (citation omitted)). We do not agree. Although the Department did not use the word moot in its answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841714 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
State v. Gregory T. Miller
Ericksen, and Miller replied, “Yes, Debra, I did.” Miller argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12595 - 2017-09-21
Ericksen, and Miller replied, “Yes, Debra, I did.” Miller argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Based upon the records I have reviewed that was not an issue.” Accordingly, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975236 - 2025-07-02
. Based upon the records I have reviewed that was not an issue.” Accordingly, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975236 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Dykes G. Jupp
. Jupp did not testify at his trial. His unexplained possession of recently stolen goods raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5004 - 2017-09-19
. Jupp did not testify at his trial. His unexplained possession of recently stolen goods raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5004 - 2017-09-19