Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20471 - 20480 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 20471 - 20480 of 58542 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after a jury trial of one count of repeated sexual assault of a child. Appointed appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
after a jury trial of one count of repeated sexual assault of a child. Appointed appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
State v. Cassandra Crawford
)(a), 939.32(1) and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying a new trial. She contends the complaint is defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
)(a), 939.32(1) and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying a new trial. She contends the complaint is defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
Production Components-Cloeren, Inc. v. Robert Shakal
about it. ¶3 The trial court correctly concluded that Druschel’s status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4837 - 2005-03-31
about it. ¶3 The trial court correctly concluded that Druschel’s status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
to a claim that Thoennes’s trial lawyer, Daniel G. Mitchell, Esq., was unconstitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2013-06-24
to a claim that Thoennes’s trial lawyer, Daniel G. Mitchell, Esq., was unconstitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
Robert Louis Halbleib v. Eileen Mary Halbleib
awarded solely to Robert. ¶3 The financial disclosure statement Robert submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6580 - 2017-09-19
awarded solely to Robert. ¶3 The financial disclosure statement Robert submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6580 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31