Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20481 - 20490 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 20481 - 20490 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order dismissing charges in this case. On remand, Kuenzi moved for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101162 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s order dismissing charges in this case. On remand, Kuenzi moved for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At that hearing, the court called Iron County case No. 2018CV10 (the case corresponding to Summerhill’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
. At that hearing, the court called Iron County case No. 2018CV10 (the case corresponding to Summerhill’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contested case hearing prior to NRB reapproving the 2016 Master Plan. The circuit court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
the contested case hearing prior to NRB reapproving the 2016 Master Plan. The circuit court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the possible dispositions the circuit court may impose in delinquency cases. Section 938.345 lists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151643 - 2017-09-21
the possible dispositions the circuit court may impose in delinquency cases. Section 938.345 lists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151643 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from [Joseph’s] rights.” The court reviewed the facts of the case and the evidence presented during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673275 - 2023-06-27
from [Joseph’s] rights.” The court reviewed the facts of the case and the evidence presented during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673275 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing. Benson complains that the two underlying circuit court cases were improperly joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244129 - 2019-07-30
without a hearing. Benson complains that the two underlying circuit court cases were improperly joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244129 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
Frank Musa v. Jefferson County Bank
2000 WI App 33 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14538 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 33 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14538 - 2017-09-21
Frank Musa v. Jefferson County Bank
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14538 - 2005-03-31