Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20481 - 20490 of 29740 for des.
Search results 20481 - 20490 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d at 639, 492 N.W.2d at 639. As we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35413 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d at 639, 492 N.W.2d at 639. As we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 10
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44582 - 2014-09-15
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44582 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
we review de novo. Schmidt, 277 Wis. 2d 570, ¶13. ¶11 Before addressing Pluemer’s arguments, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Schmidt, 277 Wis. 2d 570, ¶13. ¶11 Before addressing Pluemer’s arguments, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson-El v. Marianne Cooke
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
. 1993). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13736 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jason W.T.
is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based on the undisputed facts and the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5038 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based on the undisputed facts and the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, STATS., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10168 - 2017-09-19
review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, STATS., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10168 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103159 - 2017-09-21
is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103159 - 2017-09-21
State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor” justifies sentence modification, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6404 - 2005-03-31
issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor” justifies sentence modification, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6404 - 2005-03-31