Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 82893 for case search.

[PDF] State v. Johnny J. Waldner
of the case, the "reasonable suspicion" standard has not been met, and we therefore reverse the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9033 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Vonnie Darby
his statement, the prosecutor stated: There’s another thing. This case was charged by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13783 - 2014-09-15

Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
. This is a paternity case. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order declaring the tax intercept statute, § 46.255
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
an earlier case where he was accused of sexually assaulting his former wife because the charge was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97994 - 2013-06-10

[PDF] WI App 80
2008 WI App 80 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP1808-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32344 - 2014-09-15

State v. Vonnie Darby
. This case was charged by another prosecutor in our office, who very conscientiously wrote this up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13783 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The two cases were consolidated in Pierce County. Nitchals pled guilty to fleeing a traffic officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59565 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. re: Proposed Maps
COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. ... Filed 01-22-2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebrief.pdf - 2024-01-22

[PDF] Michael A. Luciani v. Angelina Montemurro-Luciani
that in the case of a high-income payee, the percentage standards set by administrative regulation 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16881 - 2017-09-21

Michael A. Luciani v. Angelina Montemurro-Luciani
a substantially greater income than the payer. We hold that in the case of a high-income payee, the percentage
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16881 - 2005-03-31