Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. John R. Schultz
Statutes. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Szulczewski, 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3066 - 2017-09-19
Statutes. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Szulczewski, 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3066 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Elaine H.
we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19548 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19548 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a circuit court’s findings of fact, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32828 - 2014-09-15
to a circuit court’s findings of fact, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Aaron K. Gibbs
. 48 (1993-94) requires statutory interpretation and our standard of review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2556 - 2017-09-19
. 48 (1993-94) requires statutory interpretation and our standard of review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2556 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
de novo. State v. Pernell, 165 Wis. 2d 651, 656, 478 N.W.2d 297 (Ct. App. 1991). First-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4062 - 2017-09-20
de novo. State v. Pernell, 165 Wis. 2d 651, 656, 478 N.W.2d 297 (Ct. App. 1991). First-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4062 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
information presents a constitutional issue that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶9 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
information presents a constitutional issue that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶9 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
State v. Warren A. Moffett
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
).” (citation omitted). Our review is not de novo; instead, we accord “great deference” to the issuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085749 - 2026-03-04
).” (citation omitted). Our review is not de novo; instead, we accord “great deference” to the issuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085749 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Group
was responsible for Donald’s negligence. This issue presents a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12377 - 2014-09-15
was responsible for Donald’s negligence. This issue presents a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12377 - 2014-09-15