Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 46102 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 46102 for paternity test paper work.
State v. George G. Kidd
Court set out the two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
Court set out the two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kristina Magnuson
). The two-fold test is: whether the accusation is such that the accused may determine whether it states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17725 - 2017-09-21
). The two-fold test is: whether the accusation is such that the accused may determine whether it states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17725 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark David Hayter
to adequately investigate his case or prepare for trial. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5882 - 2005-03-31
to adequately investigate his case or prepare for trial. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5882 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. These complaints, however, ignore both the applicable test and the applicable standard of review. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101950 - 2013-09-16
. These complaints, however, ignore both the applicable test and the applicable standard of review. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101950 - 2013-09-16
State v. Jeffrey G. Steffensen
had bloodshot, glassy eyes and slurred speech. After conducting field sobriety tests at the scene, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2696 - 2005-03-31
had bloodshot, glassy eyes and slurred speech. After conducting field sobriety tests at the scene, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Romero D. Wilson
). These holdings comport with the test of finality under WIS. STAT. § 808.03(1) that an order is final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16225 - 2017-09-21
). These holdings comport with the test of finality under WIS. STAT. § 808.03(1) that an order is final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16225 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard W. Foelker
grounds to believe that a violation of a traffic regulation has occurred. See id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31
grounds to believe that a violation of a traffic regulation has occurred. See id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the statement was harmless. See State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227, 256-63, 544 N.W.2d 545 (1996). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2008-09-24
the statement was harmless. See State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227, 256-63, 544 N.W.2d 545 (1996). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2008-09-24
State v. Mario D. Harrell
. State v. Washington, 176 Wis. 2d 205, 213, 500 N.W.2d 331 (Ct. App. 1993). The manifest injustice test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
. State v. Washington, 176 Wis. 2d 205, 213, 500 N.W.2d 331 (Ct. App. 1993). The manifest injustice test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to perform field sobriety tests but testified that Cross could not stand during the instructional phase
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05
to perform field sobriety tests but testified that Cross could not stand during the instructional phase
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05