Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 64042 for records/1000.
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
(1985). We shall not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6455 - 2008-04-14
(1985). We shall not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6455 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
The following undisputed facts are taken from the record before the Town Board. In September 2004, the Ottmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2005-03-31
The following undisputed facts are taken from the record before the Town Board. In September 2004, the Ottmans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewing the record and the no-merit 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92812 - 2014-09-15
reviewing the record and the no-merit 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92812 - 2014-09-15
State v. Billy W. Gladney
consider the entire record. State v. Moore, 2002 WI App 245, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 653 N.W.2d 276 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16295 - 2005-03-31
consider the entire record. State v. Moore, 2002 WI App 245, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 653 N.W.2d 276 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
witnesses at the hearing. The record does not support Thoms’s claim that he did not understand the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
witnesses at the hearing. The record does not support Thoms’s claim that he did not understand the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is pleaded and for which the referee finds an adequate factual basis in the record. In a subsequent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
is pleaded and for which the referee finds an adequate factual basis in the record. In a subsequent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Judith Johnson v. Robert R. Johnson
in the record. The trial court relied, instead, on gross amounts less verifiable mortgages as a more accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14610 - 2017-09-21
in the record. The trial court relied, instead, on gross amounts less verifiable mortgages as a more accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14610 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kinte Scott
. 4 The record does not explain what a “warrant recommendation” is. We assume it means a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16271 - 2017-09-21
. 4 The record does not explain what a “warrant recommendation” is. We assume it means a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the opportunity to speak off the record to a representative of the public defender’s office, and set a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
the opportunity to speak off the record to a representative of the public defender’s office, and set a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
. The record does not indicate a disposition for the “operating left of center” charge noted in the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
. The record does not indicate a disposition for the “operating left of center” charge noted in the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19