Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5567 - 2017-09-19
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5567 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5566 - 2017-09-19
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5566 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 105
. The trial court had ordered a presentence investigation report (PSI) to be completed before March 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36809 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court had ordered a presentence investigation report (PSI) to be completed before March 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5553 - 2017-09-19
and voluntary, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not terminating the plea negotiations and hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5553 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
one of his witnesses testified on cross-examination that Sanchez was incarcerated prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191108 - 2017-09-21
one of his witnesses testified on cross-examination that Sanchez was incarcerated prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to Isaiah H. and May K. and an order denying her motion for a new trial. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
parental rights to Isaiah H. and May K. and an order denying her motion for a new trial. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
Gary Sutrick v. Myles Wellnitz
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that § 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
the parties' boundaries.[1] The Wellnitzes argue that the trial court erroneously concluded that § 80.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31