Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 20491 - 20500 of 58547 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
was feigning mental illness. We affirm the trial court’s decision denying the motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
was feigning mental illness. We affirm the trial court’s decision denying the motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. William M. Ginsberg
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
State v. William C. Rosenberg
of disposition without trials. Rosenberg entered pleas of no contest to all three OWI charges. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15847 - 2005-03-31
of disposition without trials. Rosenberg entered pleas of no contest to all three OWI charges. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15847 - 2005-03-31
City of Menasha v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Phillip E. Holman
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
process when the trial court gave a misleading answer to a jury question. Although we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15