Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Jane Peckham v. Kristine Krenke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 violated the Dodge County Land Use Code by having a salvage yard on his property. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
1 violated the Dodge County Land Use Code by having a salvage yard on his property. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
consequence of that predicate crime under the facts of this case. He contends he cannot reasonably be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
consequence of that predicate crime under the facts of this case. He contends he cannot reasonably be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain code requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11978 - 2017-09-21
of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain code requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11978 - 2017-09-21
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 21
in violation of Wis. Admin. Code § PSY 5.01(14). Most relevant to Bar-Av’s case is § PSY 5.01(14)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27
in violation of Wis. Admin. Code § PSY 5.01(14). Most relevant to Bar-Av’s case is § PSY 5.01(14)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27