Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 83303 for case search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 83303 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sykes
was a reasonable search incident to a lawful arrest. In this case, Horvath knew the No. 03-1234-CR 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
was a reasonable search incident to a lawful arrest. In this case, Horvath knew the No. 03-1234-CR 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion when it refused to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250912 - 2019-12-04
erroneously exercised its discretion when it refused to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250912 - 2019-12-04
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/thirdbranch/sep25/d7judges.htm - 2026-02-24
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/thirdbranch/sep25/d7judges.htm - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Loveday
search request in a tavern than on an interstate bus that would soon depart. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
search request in a tavern than on an interstate bus that would soon depart. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the search of Bauer’s vehicle was valid based upon his consent and that this conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067748 - 2026-01-27
conclude that the search of Bauer’s vehicle was valid based upon his consent and that this conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067748 - 2026-01-27
2009 WI APP 99
2009 WI App 99 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1580-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
2009 WI App 99 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1580-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
WI APP 99
2009 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1580-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36881 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1580-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36881 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking sentence modification.[2] On appeal, DeNormandie argues that the search warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
seeking sentence modification.[2] On appeal, DeNormandie argues that the search warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence acquired after he consented to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195105 - 2017-09-21
with the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence acquired after he consented to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195105 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered during a warrantless search of his dwelling. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered during a warrantless search of his dwelling. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21