Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 3959 for davie.

State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
Davis, “would testify as to the location of the defendant during each of the armed robberies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14

[PDF] Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
dispute on an Eighth Amendment claim. See Davis v. Schmidt, 57 F.R.D. 37, 41 (W.D. Wis. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11409 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
1 Potts’s pleas were taken and his sentences imposed by the Honorable Cynthia M. Davis. Potts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06

[PDF] State v. Joseph M. Rucker
was wrong. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 319-20 (1974). No. 96-1763-CR 6 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10993 - 2017-09-19

Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
is uncontroverted.” Davis v. Psychology Examining Bd., 146 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 431 N.W.2d 730 (Ct. App. 1988). [4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04

[PDF] State v. Sandy J. Claude
if it is in the interests of justice that we do so. State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6514 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Legend Diamonds, Inc. v. Diamond Cutters of Milwaukee
for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4511 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas Cleereman v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
ERISA. Davis v. Chicago Mun. Emp. Credit Union, 891 F.2d 182, 184 (7th Cir. 1989). The Cleeremans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6518 - 2017-09-19