Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 2051 - 2060 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Antonio McAfee
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 McAfee raises four claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18213 - 2017-09-21
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 McAfee raises four claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18213 - 2017-09-21
State v. Antoine T. Hunter
that the trial court made comments following a suppression hearing that constituted judicial involvement in plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6833 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court made comments following a suppression hearing that constituted judicial involvement in plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antoine T. Hunter
no contest plea. Hunter claims that the trial court made comments following a suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6833 - 2017-09-20
no contest plea. Hunter claims that the trial court made comments following a suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6833 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 ¶2 On appeal, Johnson first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584939 - 2022-11-01
court denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 ¶2 On appeal, Johnson first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584939 - 2022-11-01
State v. Leporld L. Miller
to testify, he was not “present at the beginning of the trial” under § 971.04(3), Stats., and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
to testify, he was not “present at the beginning of the trial” under § 971.04(3), Stats., and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking, among other things, a Machner hearing.[2] Richard argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10
postconviction motion seeking, among other things, a Machner hearing.[2] Richard argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a new trial or, in the alternative, resentencing.2 ¶2 We conclude that Alexander is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
a new trial or, in the alternative, resentencing.2 ¶2 We conclude that Alexander is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy the trial court failed to explain the elements of the offenses that he was pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247634 - 2019-10-01
colloquy the trial court failed to explain the elements of the offenses that he was pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247634 - 2019-10-01
Christina R. Forster v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company
suit against Richard Kuether and his insurance company following a jury trial. The Forsters argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14145 - 2005-03-31
suit against Richard Kuether and his insurance company following a jury trial. The Forsters argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14145 - 2005-03-31