Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20501 - 20510 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20501 - 20510 of 29823 for des.
State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor” justifies sentence modification, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6404 - 2005-03-31
issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor” justifies sentence modification, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6404 - 2005-03-31
James C. Thomson v.
motion to compel discovery. Our review of the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3367 - 2005-03-31
motion to compel discovery. Our review of the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06
Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). Review of certiorari is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-02-19
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). Review of certiorari is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-02-19
State v. Robin L. Reid
de novo. State v. Busch, 217 Wis. 2d 429, 441, 576 N.W.2d 904 (1998). ¶7 Before addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6551 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State v. Busch, 217 Wis. 2d 429, 441, 576 N.W.2d 904 (1998). ¶7 Before addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6551 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick L. Edwards
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Hensley v. Endicott, 2001 WI 105, ¶6, 245 Wis. 2d 607, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6310 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Hensley v. Endicott, 2001 WI 105, ¶6, 245 Wis. 2d 607, 629 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Jack Williams
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carlos D. Hope
that we review de novo. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 360, 444 N.W.2d 432 (Ct. App. 1989). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d 354, 360, 444 N.W.2d 432 (Ct. App. 1989). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
Teddy A. Schlueter v. Kae Hubred
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31