Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20501 - 20510 of 68276 for did.
Search results 20501 - 20510 of 68276 for did.
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
to be imprecisely described, but only because the grant did not allocate specific space for the allowed uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
to be imprecisely described, but only because the grant did not allocate specific space for the allowed uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
State v. Matthew A. Bennett
27, 1998, and he did not request at sentencing, nor did the trial court grant, an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15328 - 2005-03-31
27, 1998, and he did not request at sentencing, nor did the trial court grant, an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15328 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jarrod H.
facility for one year. II. ANALYSIS. ¶5 Jarrod H. argues that: [T]he state did not prove beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6846 - 2017-09-20
facility for one year. II. ANALYSIS. ¶5 Jarrod H. argues that: [T]he state did not prove beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6846 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009. The DNA test of the victim’s bite wound did not uncover Hashim’s DNA. Hashim acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
, 2009. The DNA test of the victim’s bite wound did not uncover Hashim’s DNA. Hashim acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13242 - 2017-09-21
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
before she turned but did not see Rauk, the jury was not required to accept her testimony. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195745 - 2017-09-21
before she turned but did not see Rauk, the jury was not required to accept her testimony. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruled that Hansen did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Lake, and granted her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71927 - 2014-09-15
ruled that Hansen did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Lake, and granted her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71927 - 2014-09-15
State v. Karen A. Salm
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31