Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20501 - 20510 of 74552 for public records.

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 12-01 - response from Chief Justice Abrahamson
screening; Public Comment period; Petitioner’s Response period; Court Administrative hearing; Public
/supreme/docs/1201commentsabrahamson4.pdf - 2013-06-03

Rosemurgy Motors, Inc. v. John Noel
of the term. The trial court, based upon the record before it, perceived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12982 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 The record reflects that a video of Driggers’ statements to police was played at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Peter J. Ambler v. Richard F. Rice
the record to determine whether any genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Corey L. Wilkins
: (1) failed to declare, on the record, the material factors influencing its decision; (2) allocated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8407 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13

State v. Ronald Roy Peterson
of cocaine, a razor blade and short straws. A search of police records revealed that Peterson had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8876 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
it was confirmed that Powell’s underlying record for the felon-in-possession charge was a felony delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07

[PDF] State v. Dykes G. Jupp
is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on newly discovered evidence. The record does not contain any motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5004 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard C. Devereux
a hearing, implicitly concluding that the record conclusively showed that the motion lacked merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4554 - 2017-09-20