Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 68276 for did.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 68276 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
could not revisit that decision even if he did not comply with the conditions of probation. Colbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
could not revisit that decision even if he did not comply with the conditions of probation. Colbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Jose R.
and drank “[s]ome water” while he was waiting. ¶5 Although the trial court did not make findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
and drank “[s]ome water” while he was waiting. ¶5 Although the trial court did not make findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 First, Belmares argues that Landreman did not keep within his jurisdiction because he acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107263 - 2017-09-21
3 First, Belmares argues that Landreman did not keep within his jurisdiction because he acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
the trial to commence seventy-two days later. We hold that the trial court did lose competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3420 - 2017-09-19
the trial to commence seventy-two days later. We hold that the trial court did lose competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3420 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
her stipulation invalid. Specifically, Jodie argued that the circuit court did not establish whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143983 - 2015-07-06
her stipulation invalid. Specifically, Jodie argued that the circuit court did not establish whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143983 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
State v. Jose R.
the trial court did not make findings of fact in connection with its denial of Jose R.’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
the trial court did not make findings of fact in connection with its denial of Jose R.’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
to be imprecisely described, but only because the grant did not allocate specific space for the allowed uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
to be imprecisely described, but only because the grant did not allocate specific space for the allowed uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
State v. Matthew A. Bennett
27, 1998, and he did not request at sentencing, nor did the trial court grant, an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15328 - 2005-03-31
27, 1998, and he did not request at sentencing, nor did the trial court grant, an exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15328 - 2005-03-31