Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 41697 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 41697 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Anderson
for his jury trial. On August 31, 2000, he filed a motion to withdraw his pleas. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4599 - 2017-09-19
for his jury trial. On August 31, 2000, he filed a motion to withdraw his pleas. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4599 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and that 3 Holloway’s jury trial was presided over by the Honorable T. Christopher Dee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289815 - 2020-09-22
,” and that 3 Holloway’s jury trial was presided over by the Honorable T. Christopher Dee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289815 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a petition to terminate Jennifer’s parental rights to Sierra and Jordan.3 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95029 - 2014-09-15
a petition to terminate Jennifer’s parental rights to Sierra and Jordan.3 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a jury trial, that extended his mental health commitment for twelve months and authorized involuntary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161304 - 2017-09-21
a jury trial, that extended his mental health commitment for twelve months and authorized involuntary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161304 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Joshua O’Grady appeals a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
. Joshua O’Grady appeals a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
State v. Johnny Bohannon
should have instructed the jury on the defense of provocation. Third, he contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
should have instructed the jury on the defense of provocation. Third, he contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the firearms. Zabala’s lawyer told the jury that “there’s a reasonable doubt as to the knowing possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95094 - 2014-09-15
of the firearms. Zabala’s lawyer told the jury that “there’s a reasonable doubt as to the knowing possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95094 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
. Hopkins insisted he was innocent. The case was tried to a jury. Broady, Hopkins’s girlfriend, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
. Hopkins insisted he was innocent. The case was tried to a jury. Broady, Hopkins’s girlfriend, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, failing to instruct the jury on the defense of coercion, and failing to instruct on the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34377 - 2014-09-15
, failing to instruct the jury on the defense of coercion, and failing to instruct on the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34377 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jay A. Jansen
is upon the State, beyond a reasonable doubt. See Wisconsin Jury Instruct [sic] 780, and Jacobson v. U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31
is upon the State, beyond a reasonable doubt. See Wisconsin Jury Instruct [sic] 780, and Jacobson v. U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31