Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 39208 for probate forms.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 39208 for probate forms.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Department of Corrections for a year, but stayed the imposition and placed him on probation for one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142637 - 2015-06-01
to the Department of Corrections for a year, but stayed the imposition and placed him on probation for one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142637 - 2015-06-01
State v. Earl W. Haase
. § 973.20(1r) provides that “when imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime … the court … shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
. § 973.20(1r) provides that “when imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime … the court … shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
with this type of character information]…. You were on probation, were on supervision at the time you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
with this type of character information]…. You were on probation, were on supervision at the time you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
State v. Guy N. Giese
probation term imposed was an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. No postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
probation term imposed was an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. No postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
compliance with probation terms. Because it was not character evidence, the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15
compliance with probation terms. Because it was not character evidence, the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a restitution order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
of a restitution order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lee A. Wofford
recently played football with Wofford and co-defendant Dumas. Moreover, Dumas had told his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8882 - 2017-09-19
recently played football with Wofford and co-defendant Dumas. Moreover, Dumas had told his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8882 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that sentence be withheld and Nutten be placed on consecutive probation for three years on the burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106582 - 2014-01-14
that sentence be withheld and Nutten be placed on consecutive probation for three years on the burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106582 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meted out to his “similarly situated” codefendants: three received only probation and one was fined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109391 - 2017-09-21
meted out to his “similarly situated” codefendants: three received only probation and one was fined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109391 - 2017-09-21