Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 20511 - 20520 of 63609 for records/1000.
State v. Antroy T. McGee
allegations, or when the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief. Nelson v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
allegations, or when the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief. Nelson v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
his request to represent himself was knowing and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP962-CRNM 2 the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
. No. 2023AP962-CRNM 2 the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204235 - 2017-11-28
-CRNM 2 respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204235 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592918 - 2022-11-22
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592918 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231117 - 2018-12-26
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231117 - 2018-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Buechler’s testimony. The record supports that finding. ¶7 At the hearing on Bahr’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130721 - 2017-09-21
to Buechler’s testimony. The record supports that finding. ¶7 At the hearing on Bahr’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130721 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record. Id., ¶¶8, 38. Additionally, a defendant has a constitutional due process right to be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
on the record. Id., ¶¶8, 38. Additionally, a defendant has a constitutional due process right to be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
State v. Sherard D. Jenkins
some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence ….’” State v. Thompson, 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence ….’” State v. Thompson, 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
address each complaint in turn. ¶6 With respect to John’s first complaint, the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87124 - 2012-09-18
address each complaint in turn. ¶6 With respect to John’s first complaint, the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87124 - 2012-09-18