Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Severan Laron Lee
that he claims warrant a new trial: whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12923 - 2017-09-21

Charles A. Kramer v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
dismissing his claim for damages for breach of an employment contract. Kramer argues that the trial court (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3431 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 171
and closing the church. United Methodist makes no claim that the custodian is a pastor or other religious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kelley D. Avery
postconviction motion requesting a new trial. Avery claims: (1) the jury verdict was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13101 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lynda D. Dahlke v. James S. Dahlke
for unjust enrichment for overpayment of maintenance.” James’ unjust enrichment claim pertained to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4858 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John E. Schmidt (dismissed) v. City of Kenosha
of the City, claim that § 114.136 unconstitutionally infringed upon their right to participate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11289 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Fontaine Baker
and implicating others, Baker finally acknowledged that he had killed Jenkins but claimed that the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kelley D. Avery
motion requesting a new trial. Avery claims: (1) the jury verdict was not supported by sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13101 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of South Carolina, $21,602.99 on Selective’s subrogation claim against Jaster. Jaster contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13

State v. Nathan Liszewski
postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. In his motion, Liszewski claimed that his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11294 - 2005-03-31