Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 30242 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36435 - 2009-05-06
performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36435 - 2009-05-06
Margaret Barber v. Carole Barber Stoviak
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32-33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. Behnken
met is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 283 ¶14, 603 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3287 - 2005-03-31
met is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 283 ¶14, 603 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3287 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for commitment, the court shall set the matter for trial.” Sec. 980.09(2). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640746 - 2023-04-05
for commitment, the court shall set the matter for trial.” Sec. 980.09(2). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640746 - 2023-04-05
[PDF]
WI APP 196
the legislative scheme in § 9.20 is at odds with that in § 893.80(1)(b). Our analysis is de novo. See Nesbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29561 - 2014-09-15
the legislative scheme in § 9.20 is at odds with that in § 893.80(1)(b). Our analysis is de novo. See Nesbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29561 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Latisha N. Greene v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. 1985). We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11389 - 2017-09-19
. 1985). We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11389 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims that the physical-placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4370 - 2017-09-19
review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims that the physical-placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4370 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 26
a question of law that we review de novo, see Schulte, 176 Wis. 2d at 628, we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134597 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo, see Schulte, 176 Wis. 2d at 628, we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21