Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 29664 for name.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 29664 for name.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was information in the report that concerned a different man named Hernandez. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15
that there was information in the report that concerned a different man named Hernandez. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
second challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, namely, his bare- bones allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140081 - 2017-09-21
second challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, namely, his bare- bones allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James E. Johnson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Source of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9573 - 2017-09-19
Source of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9573 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
consequential; namely, that trial counsel failed to read his statements to him word-for-word, notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
consequential; namely, that trial counsel failed to read his statements to him word-for-word, notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
State v. James D. Lammers
, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 639, 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978) (“the state must reciprocate by providing the names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 639, 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978) (“the state must reciprocate by providing the names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Bryant U.
in answering the question the jury did not answer, namely whether Bryant U. had “good cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17973 - 2017-09-21
in answering the question the jury did not answer, namely whether Bryant U. had “good cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17973 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in Waukesha County over a number of years. Also named as defendants in the suit were waste-generating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
in Waukesha County over a number of years. Also named as defendants in the suit were waste-generating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68293 - 2011-07-24
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
misconduct. Mitchell’s counsel also testified that Mitchell never named Williams as a possible witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
misconduct. Mitchell’s counsel also testified that Mitchell never named Williams as a possible witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Daulton
, Daulton stated, “I’d kill the SOB too to get the money.” Daulton also gave police the names of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7261 - 2005-03-31
, Daulton stated, “I’d kill the SOB too to get the money.” Daulton also gave police the names of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7261 - 2005-03-31
State v.
their first names. [2] At the time of his conviction, William was 5’ 8” tall and weighed approximately 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
their first names. [2] At the time of his conviction, William was 5’ 8” tall and weighed approximately 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31