Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20521 - 20530 of 58546 for speedy trial.

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13368 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Incarceration Program and the Substance Abuse Program. At sentencing, Parrish’s trial counsel urged the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209502 - 2018-03-05

[PDF] State v. Cassandra Crawford
of §§ 943.20(1)(a), 939.32(1) and 939.62, STATS., and an order denying a new trial. She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13454 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Sheboygan Falls v. James B. Hodgell
of conviction for disorderly conduct following a trial to the court. 2 We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25347 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of earning capacity. ¶3 In a motion after verdict, Mehra asked for a new trial because Nicholson lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42816 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to WIS. STAT. § 425.206(2)(a) and (3). ¶3 Following a trial on the matter, the court denied Fagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105182 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kevin H. Gillson
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9586 - 2017-09-19