Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 69479 for as he.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 69479 for as he.
State v. Arlando Palmore
to a crime. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Palmore claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12977 - 2005-03-31
to a crime. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Palmore claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12977 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court erred when it denied a motion to suppress based on his claim that he was subjected to an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it denied a motion to suppress based on his claim that he was subjected to an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
he filed multiple postconviction motions in these now-consolidated cases. Relevant to this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
he filed multiple postconviction motions in these now-consolidated cases. Relevant to this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that Davis was an active participant in these events, but he does not explain why that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29171 - 2014-09-15
argues that Davis was an active participant in these events, but he does not explain why that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29171 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
was to claim Cory and Jaime as exemptions as long as he was ninety percent current in his child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9579 - 2017-09-19
was to claim Cory and Jaime as exemptions as long as he was ninety percent current in his child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2005-06)1 postconviction motion. He claims his 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29207 - 2014-09-15
(2005-06)1 postconviction motion. He claims his 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29207 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
he filed multiple postconviction motions in these now-consolidated cases. Relevant to this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
he filed multiple postconviction motions in these now-consolidated cases. Relevant to this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
trial, he contends that “[t]he blood test results should have been suppressed following the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
trial, he contends that “[t]he blood test results should have been suppressed following the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
that he was subjected to an unlawful search and seizure by an officer who “did not have reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
that he was subjected to an unlawful search and seizure by an officer who “did not have reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
), third offense. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08
), third offense. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08