Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 68485 for did.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Da Vang
for postconviction relief. Vang argues he did not validly waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7530 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. Vang argues he did not validly waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7530 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
. The court detailed its findings, including its assessment that Smith’s testimony that he did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
State v. John E.
and in admitting evidence of the periods of time he was incarcerated. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15853 - 2005-03-31
and in admitting evidence of the periods of time he was incarcerated. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, concluded the DOC had authority to impose the special rule and that the rule did not run afoul of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
, concluded the DOC had authority to impose the special rule and that the rule did not run afoul of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 motion. As he did in his direct appeal, Meyers argued trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
. § 974.06 motion. As he did in his direct appeal, Meyers argued trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
State v. Guy R. Willett
in the other case, but that it did not believe it had the authority to do so because Willett was not yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16103 - 2005-03-31
in the other case, but that it did not believe it had the authority to do so because Willett was not yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16103 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott L. Wundrow
stated she did not ask Wundrow any questions at that time or administer field tests because he appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6660 - 2005-03-31
stated she did not ask Wundrow any questions at that time or administer field tests because he appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6660 - 2005-03-31
Susan M. Fromm v. Wayne B. Fromm
divorcing him from Susan M. Fromm.[1] Because we conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2702 - 2005-03-31
divorcing him from Susan M. Fromm.[1] Because we conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2702 - 2005-03-31
Bronsteatter & Sons, Inc. v. American Growers Insurance Company
that the inception of its loss did not occur until it completed its corn harvest in December 2002, making its June 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19126 - 2005-08-30
that the inception of its loss did not occur until it completed its corn harvest in December 2002, making its June 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19126 - 2005-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
because law enforcement had received previous calls about Cleary’s drunk driving. The deputy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26
because law enforcement had received previous calls about Cleary’s drunk driving. The deputy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26