Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 34542 for in n.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 34542 for in n.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Corey Gilmore C/O Brittany Echols 4160 N. Port Washington Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53212 You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698435 - 2023-09-06
Corey Gilmore C/O Brittany Echols 4160 N. Port Washington Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53212 You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698435 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
At sentencing, trial counsel explicitly stated that the defense had “[n]o objections” to the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
At sentencing, trial counsel explicitly stated that the defense had “[n]o objections” to the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
],” and that “[o]n Jan 28th, 2010 [H.R.] coerced, and persuaded J.B. into testifying against Little.” In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
],” and that “[o]n Jan 28th, 2010 [H.R.] coerced, and persuaded J.B. into testifying against Little.” In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kawanis N. Trotter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kawanis N. Trotter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
Robert D., 181 Wis. 2d 887, 891-92, 512 N.W.2d 227 (Ct. App. 1994), the supreme court held that "[i]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3703 - 2017-09-19
Robert D., 181 Wis. 2d 887, 891-92, 512 N.W.2d 227 (Ct. App. 1994), the supreme court held that "[i]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3703 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case law sometimes refers to “the waiver rule,” see, e.g., State v. Huebner, 2000 WI 59, ¶11 n.2, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
case law sometimes refers to “the waiver rule,” see, e.g., State v. Huebner, 2000 WI 59, ¶11 n.2, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
Walworth Affordable Housing, LLC v. Village of Walworth
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Theodore N. Johnson of Godfrey, Neshek, Worth, Leibsle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14449 - 2017-09-21
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Theodore N. Johnson of Godfrey, Neshek, Worth, Leibsle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Harris
and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12490 - 2017-09-21
and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
observed that “[a]n examination of the record is seldom adequate to render factual determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
observed that “[a]n examination of the record is seldom adequate to render factual determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-veiled argument. See State v. Flynn, 190 Wis. 2d 31, 39 n.2, 527 N.W.2d 343 (Ct. App. 1994) (“We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110995 - 2017-09-21
-veiled argument. See State v. Flynn, 190 Wis. 2d 31, 39 n.2, 527 N.W.2d 343 (Ct. App. 1994) (“We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110995 - 2017-09-21