Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20531 - 20540 of 43324 for legal seperation.

Roger Bosman v. Debra A. Bosman
reasoning, bases the award on facts of record and the correct legal standards, and awards maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10170 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth Garrigan
characterized as a sentencing argument. Garrigan neither advances a legal argument nor cites to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gregory T. Keiler
3 ¶4 This court is satisfied that the trial court applied the correct legal standard to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2502 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 78
amendments. The petitioners challenged the legal effect of an amendment to Article I, Section 5(b
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84593 - 2014-09-15

Stansfield Vending, Inc. v. Osseo Truck Travel Plaza, LLC
of fact and law. Wassenaar, 111 Wis. 2d at 524-25. Where, as here, the facts are undisputed, “only legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6401 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffery S. Pestor
the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5062 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
used her position of employment with the county to evade consequences for legal violations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974805 - 2025-06-26

[PDF] Joseph Schultz v. City of Cumberland
technically or legally Schultz's agents does not affect his responsibility for the activities occurring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Raul R. Rodriguez
inferable from the record and the sentencing court’s rationale indicates that it is founded upon legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26605 - 2017-09-21

Dean Oschmann v. Secura Insurance
recovery of their losses and legal expenses in that proceeding. We conclude the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15557 - 2005-03-31