Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20541 - 20550 of 68485 for did.
Search results 20541 - 20550 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that he prepare a quitclaim deed transferring Kramer’s residence to Burneske. Witkowiak did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30129 - 2007-08-29
that he prepare a quitclaim deed transferring Kramer’s residence to Burneske. Witkowiak did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30129 - 2007-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim in the chest and Turner shot him in the buttocks. Rogers’ counsel clarified that Rogers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203530 - 2017-11-28
the victim in the chest and Turner shot him in the buttocks. Rogers’ counsel clarified that Rogers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203530 - 2017-11-28
Brown County v. April O.
that the trial court did lose competency to proceed and therefore reverse the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did lose competency to proceed and therefore reverse the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony was unintentional. The court concluded that, if Holmes testified, as he later did, that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
testimony was unintentional. The court concluded that, if Holmes testified, as he later did, that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
State v. David P. Baker
-degree sexual assault and did acts which demonstrated unequivocally, under all the circumstances, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14053 - 2005-03-31
-degree sexual assault and did acts which demonstrated unequivocally, under all the circumstances, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14053 - 2005-03-31
State v. Quincy Ferguson
, that the trial court did have statutory authority to order payment to the crime laboratory under § 973.06(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court did have statutory authority to order payment to the crime laboratory under § 973.06(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) coverage for her injuries. She contends the circuit court erred when it concluded she did not “reside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29107 - 2007-05-21
) coverage for her injuries. She contends the circuit court erred when it concluded she did not “reside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29107 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
process of law and effective representation because his reconfinement counsel did not have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40989 - 2009-09-21
process of law and effective representation because his reconfinement counsel did not have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40989 - 2009-09-21
CA Blank Order
not constitute coercion; if it did, all confessions following interrogations would be involuntary because ‘it can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-06-27
not constitute coercion; if it did, all confessions following interrogations would be involuntary because ‘it can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-06-27
State v. Raymond F. Gose
the victim recanted her accusations. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10526 - 2005-03-31
the victim recanted her accusations. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10526 - 2005-03-31