Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20551 - 20560 of 29821 for des.
Search results 20551 - 20560 of 29821 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s decision de novo. ECO, Inc. v. City of Elkhorn, 2002 WI App 302, ¶15, 259 Wis. 2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81101 - 2012-04-16
the trial court’s decision de novo. ECO, Inc. v. City of Elkhorn, 2002 WI App 302, ¶15, 259 Wis. 2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81101 - 2012-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
information presents a constitutional issue that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶9 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
information presents a constitutional issue that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶9 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
State v. Oscar Howard
whether certain undisputed facts establish “custody” and “interrogation” is de novo. See State v. Clappes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10517 - 2005-03-31
whether certain undisputed facts establish “custody” and “interrogation” is de novo. See State v. Clappes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the visitation and contact issues on summary judgment, we review the decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
the visitation and contact issues on summary judgment, we review the decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823721 - 2024-07-09
State v. Leslie M. Pirk
we review de novo. Id. A new factor is "a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Id. A new factor is "a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Ibid. Finally, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89013 - 2012-11-05
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Ibid. Finally, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89013 - 2012-11-05
State v. Glenn E. Hadley
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11146 - 2005-03-31
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11146 - 2005-03-31
State v. David S. Frederick
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
” is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06
of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06