Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20561 - 20570 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 20561 - 20570 of 58506 for speedy trial.
City of Menasha v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
appealed from a trial court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in which he alleged ineffective assistance of both his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80546 - 2014-09-15
in which he alleged ineffective assistance of both his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80546 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. William M. Ginsberg
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court held that Reimann failed to rebut Ginsberg’s prima facie case that Reimann was not injured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Podlewski
for not less than five days nor more than six months. Section 346.65(2)(b). The trial court Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13246 - 2017-09-21
for not less than five days nor more than six months. Section 346.65(2)(b). The trial court Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13246 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
ineffective assistance of both his trial counsel, Wayne Fulleylove-Krause, and his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80546 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
with intent to deliver. He first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. ¶3 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul Williams
postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Williams received effective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Williams received effective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11994 - 2005-03-31