Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20571 - 20580 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Gary Regge v. Sunset Memory Gardens
cemetery plot due to the negligence of Sunset Memory Gardens. The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12170 - 2017-09-21

State v. Pablo Martin Rios
. § 961.41(1m)(h)1 (2001–02).[1] Rios claims that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Gibson also contends that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159850 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and, as such, the trial court erred in declining to hear his motion. Additionally, Sabo contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2204 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Linda Kallas as Guardian for Ruth M. Radtke v.
asserted that material issues of fact require a trial on the issue of Ruth’s testamentary capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5707 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. 668, 687 (1984). I. New Claims Of Ineffective Assistance By Trial Counsel ¶4 Frazier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825149 - 2024-07-11

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
for armed robbery, Watson asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14117 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2203 - 2017-09-19

Linda Kallas as Guardian for Ruth M. Radtke v.
that material issues of fact require a trial on the issue of Ruth’s testamentary capacity because a psychiatric
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5707 - 2005-03-31