Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20571 - 20580 of 58285 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
, and one the day after the trial concluded.[3] During voir dire, Hunholz described his occupation as “I’m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31313 - 2007-12-26

2007 WI APP 245
. § 980.01(7) (2005-06).[1] Budd contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that Budd would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30502 - 2007-11-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
,” and attorney fees. Sutfin demanded a jury trial. Approximately a week before the scheduled trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750265 - 2024-01-11

[PDF] WI APP 219
(2005- 06)1 commitment. Barry L. Smalley claims that certain trial testimony obscured the central
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15

Robert D. Pflughoeft v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
and cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2237 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Betty A. Hutjens v. Robert E. Hutjens
regarding property division. She argues that the trial court erroneously determined that the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4598 - 2017-09-19

Gary Regge v. Sunset Memory Gardens
plot due to the negligence of Sunset Memory Gardens. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12170 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffery L. Watson
. In regard to his conviction for armed robbery, Watson asserts that the trial court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. was conceived, but the trial court found that the true biological connection was known, and that finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Paul W.
the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence and in denying his motion to dismiss one of the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5867 - 2005-03-31