Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20581 - 20590 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 20581 - 20590 of 63609 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to engage in a personal colloquy with the defendant that is reflected on the record. The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15
to engage in a personal colloquy with the defendant that is reflected on the record. The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated that the assigned judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26779 - 2014-09-15
in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated that the assigned judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11309 - 2017-09-19
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11309 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260737 - 2020-05-19
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260737 - 2020-05-19
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117453 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647838 - 2023-04-25
consideration of the submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647838 - 2023-04-25
State v. Anthony T. Blue
, to be served consecutively.[3] Although Blue claims otherwise, the record contains a Notice of Right to Seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4105 - 2005-03-31
, to be served consecutively.[3] Although Blue claims otherwise, the record contains a Notice of Right to Seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Ann M. Thenell
appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 The dispositive issue is whether the record supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4298 - 2017-09-19
appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 The dispositive issue is whether the record supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4298 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutional principles. Id. Finally, when the evidence in the record consists of disputed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
to the constitutional principles. Id. Finally, when the evidence in the record consists of disputed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15