Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 29828 for des.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 29828 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297 Wis. 2d 446, 724 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297 Wis. 2d 446, 724 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
: Linda M. Van de Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36888 - 2009-06-23
: Linda M. Van de Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36888 - 2009-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law which we review de novo. Weber v. City of Cedarburg, 129 Wis. 2d 57, 64, 384 N.W.2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34227 - 2008-10-06
a question of law which we review de novo. Weber v. City of Cedarburg, 129 Wis. 2d 57, 64, 384 N.W.2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34227 - 2008-10-06
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
that are not contested. As noted, our application of these facts to the law is subject to our de novo review. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
that are not contested. As noted, our application of these facts to the law is subject to our de novo review. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 10
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
[PDF]
Whirlpool Corporation v. Sharon Ziebert
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16886 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles J. Sassara v. Rick Braun
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Loehrke, 151 Wis.2d at 701, 445 N.W.2d at 720
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10035 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Loehrke, 151 Wis.2d at 701, 445 N.W.2d at 720
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10035 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David Beck
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Long, 2002 WI App 114, ¶33, 255 Wis. 2d 729, 647 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Long, 2002 WI App 114, ¶33, 255 Wis. 2d 729, 647 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
Taylor Investment Corporation of Wisconsin v. PLL Marquette, LLC
de novo. Id. ¶8 An award of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 814.025 is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4404 - 2017-09-19
de novo. Id. ¶8 An award of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 814.025 is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4404 - 2017-09-19