Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 68527 for did.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 68527 for did.
State v. Jarrod H.
did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] committed a complete act of second[-]degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6846 - 2005-03-31
did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] committed a complete act of second[-]degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A. Salm
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appropriately and I wouldn’t have charged the case and I wouldn’t have got the case otherwise. They did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44711 - 2009-12-16
appropriately and I wouldn’t have charged the case and I wouldn’t have got the case otherwise. They did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44711 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Bernard A. Graef
request an extension to file a late brief pursuant to RULES 809.19 and 809.82, but did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10061 - 2017-09-19
request an extension to file a late brief pursuant to RULES 809.19 and 809.82, but did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10061 - 2017-09-19
State v. Quincy Ferguson
, that the trial court did have statutory authority to order payment to the crime laboratory under § 973.06(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court did have statutory authority to order payment to the crime laboratory under § 973.06(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Union v. City of Eau Claire
required the Town’s approval. We conclude the trial court did not err and therefore affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6003 - 2017-09-19
required the Town’s approval. We conclude the trial court did not err and therefore affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6003 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick Wilder
, however, in wide-ranging comments that the trial court admitted did not “have a whole lot to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
, however, in wide-ranging comments that the trial court admitted did not “have a whole lot to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Harrison Monument and the section line. They contend that Neumann’s farm use did not encroach onto Outlot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
of the Harrison Monument and the section line. They contend that Neumann’s farm use did not encroach onto Outlot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, concluded the DOC had authority to impose the special rule and that the rule did not run afoul of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
, concluded the DOC had authority to impose the special rule and that the rule did not run afoul of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, by postconviction counsel, moved to vacate his conviction for felony murder on the ground that “the charge [did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795383 - 2024-05-07
, by postconviction counsel, moved to vacate his conviction for felony murder on the ground that “the charge [did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795383 - 2024-05-07